RFC compliance: MUST v SHOULD or MAY

[Lee]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 3:31 PM Nick Tait via bind-users wrote:
>
> On 15/01/2025 6:09 am, Lee wrote:

you snipped a bit much.  What I was responding to was
 >> You'd be better off starting with how name
>> resolution is configured on the clients.
>
> I don't have a whole lot of options there. The clients are a mixture
> of Windows and Apple products.. about all I can do (or at least all I
> know how to do) is use DHCP to give them a domain name and point them
> to a resolver.

*sigh* yet another one of my communications failures :(
What I meant was that I have almost no control over how name
resolution is configured on clients but I do control bind behavior.
So I'm fixing my perceived problem in bind and wondering if my fix
might cause problems for me down the road.

Thanks
Lee