mysterious failures/wrong-answers in reverse DNS lookup

[Michael Richardson]

Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
    > This is consistent with dns64 being configured with a prefix of
    > 2607:f0b0:f::/96.  Have you been playing around with dns64?

Yes. I do use exactly that!
I didn't connect that ::babe:f00d was within that /96 when I put my dns64 there.

So this is a synthesized reverse name then.  I didn't know that was done.

Thank for solving this mystery.
I can easily move my dns64 prefix.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20250724/8c74eef7/attachment.sig>