named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key

Renzo Marengo buckroger2011 at gmail.com
Thu May 28 06:43:46 UTC 2026


I'm using "ESV" Bind version, the rpm package dedicated for
RHEL-compatible doesn't contains these 2 files and someone says
depends on packaging worker of repository.
Why should I use 9.20.23 version ?


Il giorno gio 28 mag 2026 alle ore 08:08 Greg Choules
<gregchoules+bindusers at googlemail.com> ha scritto:
>
> Hello Renzo.
>
> There have been so many changes since 9.11.4 I would suggest that you don't get hung up on a couple of files. If you are installing 9.18.49 as a package, it will contain everything it needs.
> I would recommend that, if you are planning a jump from 9.11 anyway, that you consider 9.20.23 rather than 9.19.49.
>
> Regards, Greg
>
> On Thu, 28 May 2026 at 07:00, Renzo Marengo <buckroger2011 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> in Alma Linux 9 I have decide to migrate to latest ISC-Bind (rpm package) which is 9.18.49 version (Copr/Epel 9 repository)
>> Previous bind 9.11.4 contains these 'include' entries:
>>
>> named.rfc1912.zones
>> named.root.key
>>
>> These files don't exist inside isc-bind rpm packages
>> I think the former is about default zones (e.g. localhost) the latter is about dnssec keys.
>>
>> I'd like using standard files according to isc-bind documents.
>> How should I proceed ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> --
>> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list.


More information about the bind-users mailing list