<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><br><br>No dia 31 de Dez de 2010, às 08:18, "<a href="mailto:pyh@mail.nsbeta.info">pyh@mail.nsbeta.info</a>" <<a href="mailto:pyh@mail.nsbeta.info">pyh@mail.nsbeta.info</a>> escreveu:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>Anand Buddhdev writes: </span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span>On 31/12/2010 05:33, <a href="mailto:pyh@mail.nsbeta.info">pyh@mail.nsbeta.info</a> wrote: </span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Hi,</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Is it a right way to run rsync for bind's zone files replication?</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>If we have dozons of zones, each zone has more than one view, under this</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>case setup the master/slave with standard zone-traff is the hard way IMO.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Thanks.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Yes, that's just fine. You don't have to use zone transfers. </span><br></blockquote><span></span><br><span>Thanks. But I have another question,</span><br><span>how would bind know the zone files were changed before it reload zones? </span><br><span>Regards.</span><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#0023A3"><br></font></font></div></blockquote><br><div>I think you have to restart bind. That's why I believe it's better to use zone transfers because it's automatic.</div><div><br></div><div>Nuno Paquete</div><br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.
</body></html>