<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
<br>
On 02/15/2011 07:52 PM, Bill Larson wrote:<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">> On Feb 15, 2011, at 2:01 PM,
Munroe Sollog wrote:<br>
> <br>
>> I am investigating using the dlz-ldap driver to store my zone<br>
>> file in ldap. Before doing so, it seems that the official
driver<br>
>> page had less than stellar things to say about the ldap
driver.<br>
>> <br>
>> Is anyone using LDAP as a backend? Are you happy with the<br>
>> performance?<br>
>> <br>
>> Is there a future for LDAP and Bind?<br>
> <br>
> I played around with DLZ using OpenLDAP. (At the same time I<br>
> worked with the MySQL DLZ drivers too.) I work with Macintoshes<br>
> mainly and LDAP is the standard way that the Mac manages<br>
> information. This seems to be a natural fit.<br>
> <br>
> I would tell you, BIND using LDAP over DLZ simply sucks. It is
so <br>
> horribly slow that it makes it unusable. Running "queryperf" <br>
> against this server made you wonder if there was something
really <br>
> wrong with the system.<br>
> <br>
> I would state that BIND using an LDAP backend is a nice "proof
of <br>
> concept" but it does not make sense for any production system.<br>
> <br>
> Bill Larson</span><br>
<br>
<br>
That is somewhat disappointing. Is there any hope that Bind10 will<br>
make LDAP-backend support more feasible? I took a look at some of the<br>
docs for bind10 but nothing jumped out at me.<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)<br>
<br>
iEYEARECAAYFAk1choAACgkQVI0+KepVD/l2gACcDF7pKHJFIC10eukYans1WcEJ<br>
glAAnAhmc4L51mRwYGAIUgrK6F2Kz5Tq<br>
=pYnp<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>