<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 12:34 -0500, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
If someone uses a mobile device to send e-mail? Would ~all be better? I
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
Teach them to use smtp authentication using submission (port 587 stuff) and it doesn't matter where they come from, so long as your MTA is configured correctly of course <IMG SRC="cid:1329624673.7179.14.camel@tardis" ALIGN="middle" ALT=":)" BORDER="0"><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
also generated the following SPF using a wizard. Let me know if this
looks correct:
teamwarfare.com. IN TXT "v=spf1 a mx a:mail.teamwarfare.com
a:mail2.teamwarfare.com ip4:66.90.73.80 ip4:216.250.250.148 ~all"
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
kinda overkill, you are twice declaring the same machines AND saying any host with an A record in teamwarfare.com (risky)<BR>
just use the IP's, and if those machines have ipv6 interfaces, add them too, eg ip6:2a00:1c18:401:c00::1<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
I wouldn't need an "include:" or "ptr" statement in this right? I would
told "include:" was to include OTHER domains that are allowed to send
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
"include" is to include other domains SPF records, not plain other domains.<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
e-mail, but then again I see some people writing the domain again as an
include. Also is PTR good to use or not?
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
PTR depends on situation, but in your case, not needed.<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>