<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/26/2013 11:43 AM, Sten Carlsen
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:512CE644.6000504@s-carlsen.dk" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/02/13 15:50, Robert Moskowitz
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:512CCBC4.8000601@htt-consult.com"
type="cite"> <br>
I would expect that a namecaching server on the mailserver would
reduce traffic and resources all the way around. <br>
<br>
I don't need my mailserver to constantly be asking my name
server about, say, zen.spamhaus.org. <br>
</blockquote>
This is one reason my mailserver has a DNS server. No forward,
that only slows down things.<br>
The question here is whether there is a good reason that this
instance must not go directly to the roots?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
To support systems only visable to your internal view?<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>