<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BR>
> Vernon Schryver writes:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> > to laziness, DNS is not rocket science, I'm sure given ARM and access to</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> > google, a 13yo kid could get at least the "basics" right.</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> </FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> Laziness?--nonsense. Postel's Law and simple logic predict the</FONT></TT><BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>
truth hurts eh.<BR>
<BR>
Didn't see your original post, viewed and had to reply via Marks.<BR>
Seems your original scored 17 and was discarded<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Mark said:<BR>
><BR>
>The rational course would be to set a sunset date on TXT style spf<BR>
>records. April 2016 looks like a good date. 10 years after RFC<BR>
>4408 was published.<BR>
<BR>
I'd go along with that, if they can't get their act together within 3 years, then that IS pure laziness.<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>