<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 15:03 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
In message <1364786722.6226.2.camel@tardis>, Noel Butler writes:
>
> On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 21:21 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Ignore them. They will be addressed in the next maintenance release.
> >
>
>
> it was, but now seems to have reared its ugly head again in 9.9.2-p2
>
> Apr 1 12:20:35 fox named[589]: RSA_verify failed
> Apr 1 12:20:35 fox named[589]: error:04077068:rsa
> routines:RSA_verify:bad signature:rsa_sign.c:263:
> Apr 1 12:20:35 fox named[589]: RSA_verify failed
> Apr 1 12:20:35 fox named[589]: error:04077068:rsa
> routines:RSA_verify:bad signature:rsa_sign.c:263:
BIND 9.7.7 and BIND 9.9.2 were both released at the same time (Oct
9, 2012).
BIND 9.9.2-P1 and BIND 9.9.2-P2 are security releases.
The betas of the next maintenance release 9.9.3b1 and 9.9.3b2
contain the fix.
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
Using 9.9.3b3 on one nameserver now, yes all seems good<BR>
Have always used the latest version, applied a patch you gave me earlier, could of sworn it was fixed, unless I applied two patches and didnt think about second one. If b3 remains stable after a few days I'll throw it on main production.<BR>
<BR>
Cheers<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>