<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 02:51 -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
It's exactly as it says...
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
Instead of
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
... TXT "SPF ..."
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
You now do
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
... SPF "SPF ..."
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
Mark Andrews wrote:<BR>
No. It has a legacy SPF TXT record. It SHOULD have record of<BR>
type SPF as per RFC 4408. <BR>
<BR>
Named will complain if both types are not present.<BR>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>