<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 08:50 -0500, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
> This was discussed here already, and imho this is anti-spf bullshit like
> all those "spf breaks forwarding" FUD. The SPF RR is already here and is
> preferred over TXT that is generik RR type, unlike SPF.
It is not Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt that "SPF breaks forwarding".
SPF *DOES* break forwarding. I have a case I am researching right now
where forwarded mail is undeliverable due to SPF checking at the
new destination.
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>
Nothing is perfect, every single gmail user coming via mailing lists also fails DKIM.<BR>
There is no magic answer, but I wish more would enforce SPF, especially banks, but cant expect them to have any clue, their only expertise is ripping people off.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>