<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 23:40 +0000, Evan Hunt wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:20:29AM +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> I have been using this since 9.9.4bx, and although documentation is/was
> lacking at the time, so there might be a whitelisting somewhere , but in
> its absence, I highly advise against using RRL if your mail servers use
> those DNS servers
A mail server should be talking to a caching resolver, not an
authoritative DNS server; RRL is for authoritaive servers. So the
situation shouldn't ordinarily arise.
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
Yes true, but in some cases, some servers are both, using views, try tell a small business with 3 staff and only a combined mail/web, plus one DNS (I act as secondary so that saves them a bit) that they need to install another server, dedicated to caching if they insist of having this feature enabled <IMG SRC="cid:1379639443.6551.6.camel@tardis" ALIGN="middle" ALT=":)" BORDER="0"> - this resembles countless small business and SOHO setups, so it would be advantageous in future releases if it can not currently, be configured using views.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>