Two quick resolver questions
Vladislav Yasevich
vlad at zk3.dec.com
Fri May 19 17:19:25 UTC 2000
Cricket
I did not add any functionality patches. The patches were to fix
some of the CERT advisories in BIND 8.1.2 (specifically sprintf() with
MAXDNAME).
-vlad
P.S. I did implement something similar to no-check-names with a slight
extension. In my version, users may specify a set of characters they want
to be valid. They can also turn of name checking completely.
I will be adding support no-check-names in the next rev.
Cricket Liu wrote:
>
> Hi, Vladislav. Thanks for replying!
>
> > Well, Compaq ships both. In the 4.0 stream of the OS (4.0D, E, F...)
> > we ship the the 4.9 based resolver. In the 5.0 stream, we ship the
> > 8.1.2 resolver with some 8.2.2 P5 patches.
>
> May I ask what the 8.2.2 patches you included do? Did you implement
> any of the 8.2-era options, like timeout, attempts, rotate and
> no-check-names?
>
> cricket
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Vladislav Yasevich Tel: (603) 884-1079
Compaq Computer Corp. Fax: (435) 514-6884
110 Spit Brook Rd ZK03-3/T07
Nashua, NH 03062
More information about the bind-workers
mailing list