bind9 doesn't close extra fds
paul at vix.com
Tue Aug 27 18:25:41 UTC 2002
> > bind8 loops for over a minute on modern hardware for which
> > _SC_OPEN_MAX is often 16777216.
> That *is* quite large...
it sure surprised the heck out of *us*.
> > the bind9 behaviour was minimalistic.
> But is it right? In my experience, programs are expected to close
> unnecessary file descriptors when they daemonize. Perhaps this
> behavior could be made conditional for the "modern hardware" you
we could keep closing until fd>_SC_OPEN_MAX or the number of failed
closes due to EBADF exceeded some threshold (42 being my favourite.)
More information about the bind-workers