BIND9's NXDOMAIN vs NOERROR/NODATA
ogud at ogud.com
Fri Dec 13 01:12:06 UTC 2002
At 17:08 2002-12-12, Mark_Andrews at isc.org wrote:
> Well I still think there is DNSSEC is wrong on this and the
> rcode should be NOERROR. We should use DS as a opportunity to
> fix this.
Not needed we are in the process of re documenting DNSSEC and
this should be covered there. I have forwarded this thread to the
editors to figure out if this is a simple clarify or requires
action. Feel free to bring this issue up on namedroppers and
if we have a clear consensus that Bind-9 is wrong then DNSSEC-bis
can reflect that.
> It is possible by looking at the NXT record alone to determine
> if the query name is actually for a empty node.
Exactly, the non terminal node exists in the sense it terminates a wild
card but as there is no data a the node no NXT is needed for it.
More information about the bind-workers