division of code into libraries - openssl dependancy

[Michael Richardson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Andrews <Mark.Andrews at isc.org> writes:
    >> This is, for static linking, not a problem, since if the program doesn't use
    >> the crypto, it doesn't pull dst_* in. For dynamic linking, ironically, the
    >> program winds up bigger...
    >> 
    >> I would like to propose that the dnssec functions be moved out of libdns,
    >> into libdnssec, perhaps.

    Mark> 	libdst would be more appropriate.  You could then have a crypto
    Mark> 	aware libdst and crypto unaware libdst instead of a crypto aware
    Mark> 	libdns and a crypto unaware libdns.  However you would still need
    Mark> 	to link against libcrypto even if the upper layers don't make use
    Mark> 	of crypto when linking against the crypto aware libdst.

  okay, works for me.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPfVWtIqHRg3pndX9AQHQjgP/XnJPp0wukEwIMpyeAdRBhWFYK0neqjcg
4W5XgibaWC/AA0P4tLVD7MBV4yIWUPQkZNP8ewTNM4ew+8xho4Lm0asRV6ObkbXa
1s7Up8qgEAJhKBGBADQdeC+DbO0Bfq0ZDj9lRNiFk0xCj17MnKXP/SldZ2R2sORL
YgMszsCf1xc=
=Z9X0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----