Will named get capability to dynamically update forwarders?

Lars-Johan Liman liman at autonomica.se
Wed Dec 5 18:00:55 UTC 2007


paul at xelerance.com:
> dhclient rewriting named.conf is a really bad hack at best. Isn't this
> someting for rndc?

On the file-hack side of things: you could to it in a separate file
that you "include" into the central named.conf, to make the scripting
easier. It's still a hack, though. :-)

On the rndc side, I believe that rndc is not designed to handle config
data. There are three types of information that one may want to convey
to a running name server, commands, config data, and zone data. Rndc
hadles the first. You're talking about the second.

I view this as input to the discussions regarding a new name server
management protocol, which may be able to handle all three. I don't
believe that rndc (in its current form) is the right place for this.

YMMV.

				Cheers,
				  /Liman
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand
# binary numbers, and those who don't.
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# Lars-Johan Liman, M.Sc.	! E-mail: liman at autonomica.se
# Senior Systems Specialist     ! HTTP  : //www.autonomica.se/
# Autonomica AB, Stockholm 	! Voice : +46 8 - 615 85 72
#----------------------------------------------------------------------


More information about the bind-workers mailing list