Will named get capability to dynamically update forwarders?
atkac at redhat.com
Wed Dec 5 16:35:58 UTC 2007
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:52:48AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > recently I've started discussion on fedora-devel list
> > (https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg00146.htm
> > l)
> > about issue with dynamic forwarders. We built named with D-Bus patches
> > (in contrib subdirectory) in Red Hat but now when dhcdbd daemon was
> > removed those patches are unusable. From discussion it looks for me
> > that dynamically changed forwarders will be very usefull especially
> > when We talk about DNSSEC or caching nameservers on laptops. I'm not
> > sure what is best and general approach but use rndc utility looks like
> > best for me. What's your opinion?
> Have dhclient's exit-hooks update a file and then reconfigure
I'm not sure how you want update forwarders. You mean update forwarders
statement directly in named.conf with that script? This doesn't sound
fine for me.
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the bind-workers