feature survey -- bind9 dnssec -- autogenerate missing signatures
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Sep 2 10:36:16 UTC 2008
On Sep 2, 2008, at 00:20, Paul Vixie wrote:
> should bind9 dnssec be able to load an unsigned zone, sort it into
> dnssec security order, and then generate signatures and nsecs on the
> fly, only for rrsets that are actually queried?
I'm not sure this is a good idea because the people who are most
likely to use this feature will probably be unaware of the risks of
having the signing key on-line and won't have taken suitable
precautions. They're also likely to be the people that will be
startled by the SOA serial number magically changing as a result of on
the fly signing.
On a more practical level, how would this work when a slave server
gets a query with the DO bit set for a name that's been signed on the
master but that signature goop has still to find its way to the slave?
More information about the bind-workers
mailing list