dig feature request

Mark Andrews marka at isc.org
Wed Jan 27 05:23:40 UTC 2010


In message <5FB5F3ED-E6FC-4368-9C1F-A7D196573CF4 at knig.ht>, Dave Knight writes:
> On 2010-01-26, at 11:50 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Mark Andrews writes:
> >> 
> >> In message <20100127025417.GB10156 at isc.org>, Evan Hunt writes:
> >>>> Should I do that with this, or is this just guidance for my future
> >>>> reference? :)
> >>> 
> >>> I can take care of it this time. :)
> >> 
> >> 	dig axfr +noall +answer dv.isc.org | sed '$d'
> >> 	dig axfr +noall +answer dv.isc.org | sort -u
> >> -- 
> >> Mark Andrews, ISC
> >> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> >> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
> > 
> > Note: also that the double SOA has not been a issue for years now.
> 
> Not for BIND anyway.

It shouldn't be a issue for other vendors either as the master file
format allows for duplicate records and axfr does not guarantee no
duplicates.  If you want no duplicates you MUST post process a axfr
response.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org



More information about the bind-workers mailing list