[svn] commit: r3711 - /branches/trac408/src/lib/nsas/tests/zone_entry_unittest.cc
BIND 10 source code commits
bind10-changes at lists.isc.org
Fri Dec 3 21:31:42 UTC 2010
Author: vorner
Date: Fri Dec 3 21:31:42 2010
New Revision: 3711
Log:
Fix states in tests
Modified:
branches/trac408/src/lib/nsas/tests/zone_entry_unittest.cc
Modified: branches/trac408/src/lib/nsas/tests/zone_entry_unittest.cc
==============================================================================
--- branches/trac408/src/lib/nsas/tests/zone_entry_unittest.cc (original)
+++ branches/trac408/src/lib/nsas/tests/zone_entry_unittest.cc Fri Dec 3 21:31:42 2010
@@ -96,8 +96,10 @@
TEST_F(ZoneEntryTest, CallbackNoNS) {
shared_ptr<InheritedZoneEntry> zone(new InheritedZoneEntry(resolver_,
EXAMPLE_CO_UK, RRClass::IN(), nameserver_table_, nameserver_lru_));
- // It should accept the callback
- zone->addCallback(callback_, ANY_OK, zone);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::NOT_ASKED, zone->getState());
+ // It should accept the callback
+ zone->addCallback(callback_, ANY_OK, zone);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::IN_PROGRESS, zone->getState());
// Ask for the nameservers
EXPECT_NO_THROW(resolver_->provideNS(0, rr_empty_));
// And tell imediatelly that it is unreachable (when it has no nameservers)
@@ -111,8 +113,10 @@
rr_single_->setTTL(RRTTL(0));
shared_ptr<InheritedZoneEntry> zone(new InheritedZoneEntry(resolver_,
EXAMPLE_CO_UK, RRClass::IN(), nameserver_table_, nameserver_lru_));
- // It should accept the callback
- zone->addCallback(callback_, ANY_OK, zone);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::NOT_ASKED, zone->getState());
+ // It should accept the callback
+ zone->addCallback(callback_, ANY_OK, zone);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::IN_PROGRESS, zone->getState());
EXPECT_NO_THROW(resolver_->provideNS(0, rr_single_));
// It should not be answered yet, it should ask for the IP addresses
EXPECT_TRUE(callback_->successes_.empty());
@@ -131,13 +135,15 @@
EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::NOT_ASKED, zone->getState());
// It should accept the callback
zone->addCallback(callback_, ANY_OK, zone);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::IN_PROGRESS, zone->getState());
EXPECT_NO_THROW(resolver_->provideNS(0, rr_single_));
// It should not be answered yet, it should ask for the IP addresses
EXPECT_TRUE(callback_->successes_.empty());
EXPECT_EQ(0, callback_->unreachable_count_);
resolver_->asksIPs(ns_name_, 1, 2);
- // We should be IN_PROGRESS
- EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::IN_PROGRESS, zone->getState());
+ // We should be READY, as it marks we have nameservers
+ // (not that they are ready)
+ EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::READY, zone->getState());
// Give two more callbacks, with different address families
zone->addCallback(callback_, V4_ONLY, zone);
zone->addCallback(callback_, V6_ONLY, zone);
@@ -151,8 +157,6 @@
EXPECT_TRUE(IOAddress("192.0.2.1").equal(callback_->successes_[1]));
// None are rejected
EXPECT_EQ(0, callback_->unreachable_count_);
- // We are still in progress, not everything arrived
- EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::IN_PROGRESS, zone->getState());
EXPECT_NO_THROW(resolver_->answer(2, ns_name_, RRType::AAAA(),
rdata::in::AAAA("2001:db8::1")));
// This should answer the third callback
@@ -177,13 +181,13 @@
EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::NOT_ASKED, zone->getState());
// It should accept the callback
zone->addCallback(callback_, ANY_OK, zone);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::IN_PROGRESS, zone->getState());
EXPECT_NO_THROW(resolver_->provideNS(0, rr_single_));
// It should not be answered yet, it should ask for the IP addresses
EXPECT_TRUE(callback_->successes_.empty());
EXPECT_EQ(0, callback_->unreachable_count_);
resolver_->asksIPs(ns_name_, 1, 2);
- // We should be IN_PROGRESS
- EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::IN_PROGRESS, zone->getState());
+ EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::READY, zone->getState());
// Give two more callbacks, with different address families
zone->addCallback(callback_, V4_ONLY, zone);
zone->addCallback(callback_, V6_ONLY, zone);
@@ -192,7 +196,6 @@
// One should be rejected, but two still stay, they have chance
EXPECT_EQ(0, callback_->successes_.size());
EXPECT_EQ(1, callback_->unreachable_count_);
- EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::IN_PROGRESS, zone->getState());
// Answer the A one and see it answers what can be answered
ASSERT_EQ(2, callback_->successes_.size());
EXPECT_NO_THROW(resolver_->answer(1, ns_name_, RRType::A(),
@@ -223,8 +226,9 @@
EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::NOT_ASKED, zone->getState());
// It should accept the callback
zone->addCallback(callback_, V4_ONLY, zone);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::IN_PROGRESS, zone->getState());
EXPECT_NO_THROW(resolver_->provideNS(0, rrns_));
- EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::IN_PROGRESS, zone->getState());
+ EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::READY, zone->getState());
// It asks a question (we do not know which nameserver)
shared_ptr<Name> name;
ASSERT_NO_THROW(name.reset(new Name((*resolver_)[1]->getName())));
@@ -233,9 +237,6 @@
// Nothing should be answered or failed yet
EXPECT_EQ(0, callback_->unreachable_count_);
EXPECT_EQ(0, callback_->successes_.size());
- // It should be still IN_PROGRESS and ask the second nameserver
- // (at last now, if not before)
- EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::IN_PROGRESS, zone->getState());
ASSERT_TRUE(resolver_->asksIPs((*resolver_)[3]->getName(), 3, 4));
// Fail the second one
resolver_->requests[3].second->failure();
@@ -243,8 +244,6 @@
// v4 address
EXPECT_EQ(1, callback_->unreachable_count_);
EXPECT_EQ(0, callback_->successes_.size());
- // We should still be IN_PROGRESS, waiting for v6
- EXPECT_EQ(Fetchable::IN_PROGRESS, zone->getState());
// And question for v6 or any should still wait while v4 should be failed
// right away
zone->addCallback(callback_, V6_ONLY, zone);
More information about the bind10-changes
mailing list