BIND 10 trac2420, created. 9397bd5dbf2b82a62f2006775ea92bb3b05b755d [2420] an unrelated fix: set the "signed" flag only with an apex NSEC
BIND 10 source code commits
bind10-changes at lists.isc.org
Tue Nov 13 02:30:53 UTC 2012
The branch, trac2420 has been created
at 9397bd5dbf2b82a62f2006775ea92bb3b05b755d (commit)
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 9397bd5dbf2b82a62f2006775ea92bb3b05b755d
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Mon Nov 12 18:28:39 2012 -0800
[2420] an unrelated fix: set the "signed" flag only with an apex NSEC
otherwise it could reslt in assert() failure in getClosestNSEC() for a
half-broken zone that desn't have any NSEC at the zone apex. also made
a small optimization to detect if a name is the zone origin: just compare
the corresponding node with the origin node.
commit 7eb7d5efa51485ec96434c08249856cc8cf7c8c9
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Mon Nov 12 18:24:49 2012 -0800
[2420] cleanup: unify getCoveredType() used in 2 .cc's.
note: due to the slightly different definition the one used in rdataset.cc
is still there.
commit 38f650c71af54bc238221b540dd2fa302a862885
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Mon Nov 12 17:48:33 2012 -0800
[2420] catch the rare case of RRSIG-only for NSEC3
commit f7e29b88367c65f57c6a84383fd0ebc520dc26d6
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Mon Nov 12 14:56:17 2012 -0800
[2420] make sure RRSIG-only data are excluded in additional processing
commit 798e61add913f36ebf6967d62e456ec6c6e1b757
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Mon Nov 12 14:55:51 2012 -0800
[2420] added the new test data file introduced in prev commit to makefile
commit cb20cd84c91a2de735a0e31653cf8704efd5e159
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Mon Nov 12 14:42:53 2012 -0800
[2420] fixed old memory datasrc test failed to prevent failure due to singonly
this is an intermediate regression due to the previous change. It's an ugly
workaround, but the real fix is to deprecate the old version ASAP, so I
didn't bother to fix it cleanly.
commit 56b5c356dd0e122da66a0ee94c33368ff1f86386
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Mon Nov 12 14:18:24 2012 -0800
[2420] added tests with RRSIG-only RRsets.
Due to the extension to RdataSet::find(), the tested code doesn't have to
be modified.
commit d805ae680fc4fc5920c5bc50e2ae0817379df1cf
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Mon Nov 12 13:46:55 2012 -0800
[2420] extend RdataSet::find() to control whether to match sig-only RdataSets.
and use it in zone data updater to preserve the previous behavior.
commit 371ad74bd7276f2c5e6c9917f154ebd333a835e0
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Thu Nov 8 21:21:06 2012 -0800
[2420] enable the RRSIG-only case in ZoneDataLoader.
commit bedd068396a44ac7fed5a7d4c3f3a8a94861c327
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Thu Nov 8 21:07:33 2012 -0800
[2420] handle RRSIG-for-NSEC3 only cases.
commit 4fb2c320d91021da1a7fa3c3f9f2f3a2906ee24f
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Thu Nov 8 20:35:20 2012 -0800
[2420] supported the case for adding RRSIG-only
except for RRSIG for NSEC3, which is a bit trickier and will be handled
separately.
commit 002527091f067467ab0d85837d12b89295e961d1
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Thu Nov 8 18:52:18 2012 -0800
[2420] initial attempt of allowing RRSIG-only case
looks like we need to update the updater first, so it's disabled for now.
commit 1558c3b17a0c31adb4aa62ad2f9d1cff65056bbd
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Thu Nov 8 16:16:43 2012 -0800
[2420] ported loadRRSIGFollowsNothing test from memory_client test
so that we can test loading related in a closer place to the load related
classes.
commit 89a677920d39e4da45f49811f6bb61e3e46fcd49
Author: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei at isc.org>
Date: Fri Nov 9 18:38:46 2012 -0800
[2420] refactoring: reorder RdataSet::destroy to meet segment obj holder req.
not directly related to the subject of this branch, but this will help
the development.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the bind10-changes
mailing list