BIND 10 trac2738, updated. f0f75ecda5cb7e51fbebbcf35ca40f3d38b4b535 [2738] Write considerations
BIND 10 source code commits
bind10-changes at lists.isc.org
Wed Apr 3 08:42:54 UTC 2013
The branch, trac2738 has been updated
via f0f75ecda5cb7e51fbebbcf35ca40f3d38b4b535 (commit)
from 70a919f029b159119a50ac6d6fded6b843167ef1 (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit f0f75ecda5cb7e51fbebbcf35ca40f3d38b4b535
Author: Michal 'vorner' Vaner <michal.vaner at nic.cz>
Date: Wed Apr 3 10:41:32 2013 +0200
[2738] Write considerations
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
doc/design/ipc-high.txt | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/doc/design/ipc-high.txt b/doc/design/ipc-high.txt
index b7c1efc..5bfeada 100644
--- a/doc/design/ipc-high.txt
+++ b/doc/design/ipc-high.txt
@@ -176,3 +176,10 @@ messages or messages of several tens of megabytes is probably a bad
idea. While there's no architectural limitation with regards of the
number of transferred messages or their sizes, the code is not
optimised and it would probably be very slow.
+
+We currently expect the system not to be at heavy load. Therefore, we
+expect the daemon to keep up with clients sending messages. The
+libraries write in blocking mode, which is no problem if the
+expectation is true, as the write buffers will generally be empty and
+the write wouldn't block, but if it turns out it is not the case, we
+might need to reconsider.
More information about the bind10-changes
mailing list