BIND 10 resolver_research_and_design, updated. 5d221a4027cdd09be11a45cd30bea2ef5b67bbed Some random suggestions to sharing of port
BIND 10 source code commits
bind10-changes at lists.isc.org
Thu Feb 21 08:35:51 UTC 2013
The branch, resolver_research_and_design has been updated
via 5d221a4027cdd09be11a45cd30bea2ef5b67bbed (commit)
from 07738f9d7122d58dd7e42b7fc414f46c3f5ede35 (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 5d221a4027cdd09be11a45cd30bea2ef5b67bbed
Author: Michal 'vorner' Vaner <michal.vaner at nic.cz>
Date: Thu Feb 21 09:35:33 2013 +0100
Some random suggestions to sharing of port
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
.../resolver/02-mixed-recursive-authority-setup | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/doc/design/resolver/02-mixed-recursive-authority-setup b/doc/design/resolver/02-mixed-recursive-authority-setup
index 84658ef..81d80e3 100644
--- a/doc/design/resolver/02-mixed-recursive-authority-setup
+++ b/doc/design/resolver/02-mixed-recursive-authority-setup
@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ Ideally we will run the authoritative server independently of the
recursive resolver.
We need a way to run both an authoritative and a recursive resolver on
-a single platform, listening on the same IP/port.
+a single platform, listening on the same IP/port. But we need a way to
+run only one of them as well.
We have 3 basic components involved in this mix:
@@ -26,3 +27,8 @@ d. Have a simple "receptionist" module which knows which zones we are
Stephen did some modeling work on this already. We need to understand
the latency and throughput implications of any of these approaches.
+
+It would be nice to solve the forwarding of packets to DDNS and XfrIn
+with this too, if it worked. Currently, it is not possible to run more
+instances of these modules to divide the load and it is not possible
+to run them without Auth.
More information about the bind10-changes
mailing list