[bind10-dev] BIND 9 style guidelines

Evan Hunt each at isc.org
Wed Sep 2 05:06:31 UTC 2009


> Here are a few points I wondered in my prototype experiments:
> 
> - File suffix: .cc vs .cpp, .hh vs .h

If this were a democracy I'd vote for .cc and .h, but anything we choose
is fine with me.

> - Naming convention (especially) for class members.  There seems to be
>   two popular variants:

I *much* prefer lower_case_with_underscores, as I find it much easier to
read than intraWordCapitalization.  This grows ever more important as
my eyes age.

Most C++ projects I've looked at in the past, though, seem to use the
interCapStyle.  I had been assuming we would do the same simply because
it appears to be the standard idiom of the language we're working in.
But if it's open for discussion... I would *really* like it if we
standardized on lower_case_with_underscores.

>   Evan said our previous consensus was not to use underscores.

I have no recollection of saying this.  What was the context, please?

                                        eh




More information about the bind10-dev mailing list