[bind10-dev] BIND 9 style guidelines

[JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉]

At Wed, 2 Sep 2009 05:06:31 +0000,
Evan Hunt <each at isc.org> wrote:

> > - Naming convention (especially) for class members.  There seems to be
> >   two popular variants:
> 
> I *much* prefer lower_case_with_underscores, as I find it much easier to
> read than intraWordCapitalization.  This grows ever more important as
> my eyes age.
> 
> Most C++ projects I've looked at in the past, though, seem to use the
> interCapStyle.  I had been assuming we would do the same simply because
> it appears to be the standard idiom of the language we're working in.
> But if it's open for discussion... I would *really* like it if we
> standardized on lower_case_with_underscores.

I forgot to say that, but I have the same impression that
"interCapStyle" is seemingly more popular.  But XORP generally uses
lower_case_with_underscores.

Note also that I specially meant class *members*.  As far as I can see
class *names* always follow the "InterCapStyle" convention (I is also
capitalized).

class InterCapStyle { // mostly unanimous.  no interCapStyle or inter_cap_style
public
	int interCapMember;  // this seems to be more popular
	int lower_case_member; // but this is also adopted by some
};

---
JINMEI, Tatuya