[bind10-dev] Conditional jumps based on unitialized in #439 auth tests

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 jinmei at isc.org
Thu Dec 23 00:56:22 UTC 2010


At Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:43:34 +0800,
"Jerry" <jerry.zzpku at gmail.com> wrote:

> > > I think the branch hasn't been ready for review yet. Because I just
> added
> > a
> > > new config item for memory data source and haven't updated the unittest,
> > 
> > Wait..."haven't updated the unittest" should never happen in theory:-)
> 
> Yeah, in theory:-) But it did happen in practice, for example, design
> unittest cases->write some code->update unittest cases->update code/write
> some code... Because it is difficult to define all the unittest cases at the
> first beginning, unless we understand the requirements quite well.

Yeah that's true, if this is what happened that's fine.  (to be very
strict, the test should have been written right after the design, but
I understand compiler based languages it's sometimes almost
impossible).

---
JINMEI, Tatuya
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.



More information about the bind10-dev mailing list