[bind10-dev] usage of "virtual" declarations in derived classes

[Stephen Morris]

On 21 Jul 2010, at 10:52, Shane Kerr wrote:

> I tend to think we should always put "virtual" in a method definition if
> it is defined as virtual in the parent class, simply to document the
> method behavior. Since it *is* virtual, whether we declare it or not,
> but it is non-obvious unless you look at the entire hierarchy. :(

+1

Stephen