[bind10-dev] Blog comment from BDB developer
Shane Kerr
shane at isc.org
Thu Jun 24 10:15:00 UTC 2010
All,
Interesting comment on the BIND 10 blog today:
https://www.isc.org/community/blog/201004/why-sqlite3#comment-510
Comment by Gregory Burd (not verified) on 23 Jun 2010
We here in the Berkeley DB group within Oracle would be happy to
support your testing efforts comparing BDB SQL(ite) with native
SQLite. I'm fairly confident that you'll see a dramatic
difference in concurrency, throughput and query execution time.
This, to me, seems like a great way to provide value to those
who use BIND10 with the minimal effort. A configuration-time
switch to choose BDB SQL(ite) or native SQLite would provide
your customers with an easy way to improve performance and help
you avoid all that custom engineering to improve performance by
working around SQLite restrictions (using multiple database
files for instance). Please contact me if you'd like to do this
work with us.
regards, and thanks for your hard work,
-greg
I think that's very cool, since I was hoping for BDB support in the next
3 months. :)
--
Shane
More information about the bind10-dev
mailing list