[bind10-dev] [svn] commit: r1108 - in /branches/each-nsec3/src/lib/dns/cpp: Makefile.am base32.cc base32.h sha1.cc sha1.h tests/Makefile.am tests/base32_unittest.cc tests/sha1_unittest.cc

[Jeremy C. Reed]

> > As far as I see in RFC 3174, the C++ code is not there but I agree that 
> > code is near identical. The C++ code has a copyright and "All Rights 
> > Reserved" and no license. 
> 
> I don't know what you mean by "the C++ code" ... what's in sha1.cc
> is precisely what's in the RFC, with local style modifications done
> by me.

Okay. In the jabber I mentioned the C++ code and when I saw the ".cc" 
extension, I assumed it was the C++ code -- even though I didn't look 
closely other than diffing it against the author's C++ version. (That's 
why I mentioned I saw various differences.) Later I saw Francis's 
comment about it should be C++ style.

On a different note: should we use .c extension for C code?

Did you consider using the author's C++ version? His website indicates 
he had fixes and improvements since his old RFC implementation.