[bind10-dev] Sha1

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 jinmei at isc.org
Tue Mar 16 16:56:22 UTC 2010


At Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:45:47 +0100,
Shane Kerr <shane at isc.org> wrote:

> > We cannot ship the current sha1 implementation as we previously  
> > discussed.  We need to import BIND9 code or other safe code, or skip  
> > nsec3 this time.
> 
> Just out of curiosity, why is this unsafe?

License (copyright) issue.  We discussed this before:
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/2010-March/000587.html
(see also other related messages of this thread).

> It doesn't look like the BIND 10 code should be that difficult to
> convert... except of course we need OpenSSL.

We have three options:

1. incorporate BIND 9 version of sha1 (lib/isc/sha1.c)
2. use external library
3. drop NSEC3 (for year1 release)

Any of them has some pros and cons.  

If we have two weeks, e.g., option 1 would be the easiest and most
reasonable short-term solution.  The problem is that we only have a
few days.

---
JINMEI, Tatuya



More information about the bind10-dev mailing list