[bind10-dev] Locking question on blog article

[Michael Graff]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Looks good to me.

I'd suggest reiterating that we are only choosing sqlite3 as a starting
point, and databases of all types are potentially on the table.  Having
feedback about which specific ones are desirable for users would be
useful at this stage.

On 2010-05-10 9:44 PM, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Michael,
> 
> Someone posted a question about SQLite locking on our blog:
> 
> https://www.isc.org/community/blog/201004/why-sqlite3#comment-476
> 
> Do you think you can give a reasonable answer? 
> 
> BTW, he mentions some Oracle SQLite BDB thingy. A bit of googling
> reveals this:
> 
> http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/berkeley-db/sql.html
> 
> It will be interesting to do some benchmarks on this at some point. I'm
> specifically wondering about a comparison between:
> 
>       * SQLite
>       * BDB
>       * BDB via the SQLite API
> 
> If BDB via the SQLite API is faster than "native" SQLite and it supports
> an expression that can give us the next/previous values of a column,
> then maybe we should use this as our default DNSSEC-enabled backend.
> 
> --
> Shane

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvph28ACgkQ+NNi0s9NRJ2eXQCcCKs8AMO/2QfB85LNs7okFzhp
5mAAnj+pwA/IDew86hlMXvBbdFoyvyu9
=k8Ev
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----