[bind10-dev] Thoughts on Architecture of Xfrin & Notify-In/Out

Michael Graff mgraff at isc.org
Fri May 14 15:45:12 UTC 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2010-05-14 4:33 AM, zhanglikun wrote:

> I preper to one process for zone manager, one process for xfrin.  Xfrin will 
> has multiple threads, one thread for one transfer, and xfrin should maintain 
> one transfer-task queue if there is too many concurrent transfer tasks (more 
> than max_transfer_in)needs to be done.

Why are you choosing to use threads here, when we choose not to use
threads in something like the auth server, but instead choose to use
more than one process?

That is, what does using threads gain over multiple processes?

- --Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvtcAgACgkQ+NNi0s9NRJ23DQCeOe7c4GmBeiyMWCvpB/tDOOeQ
bewAnijXrmi5/43hP1fJuyHEiZR3xBYW
=10a2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the bind10-dev mailing list