[bind10-dev] Extending views with groups

[J. Thomsen]

Jerry Scharf, 

>While you may be right that it would be a simple change, it is a change 
>in semantics. The surprise to anyone who understands the current 
>operation of views would be large. 

Currently if two views are configured to handle the same set of clients, it must be
considered as a configuration error as the second view is not accessible. 

Thus there is no overload of semantics, only an extension.

>So please put this in as a new 
>feature with a different name rather than trying to overload the view 
>semantics.

Defining a new feature with new keywords etc. is just making a complexity out of a simple
thing.

But anyway I have voiced my suggestion, which I believed this list was for.


- Jørgen Thomsen