[bind10-dev] include "review" time in the sprint estimations

[Larissa Shapiro]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeremy,

Here is how I understand this issue. Peer review should be the same as
it has always been. One of the scrum concepts is the "definition of
done" and I know we still need to talk about this but I assume that peer
review is part of a feature being "done" for us.

the idea is that review time comes off the "buffer" or "overhead" time
for the project. I think we may not get this estimated perfectly the
first time, or even the second and this is okay, and to be expected. We
will get there. If it doesn't make sense to put the review time in the
buffer, it could go in individual task estimates I think, but for now....

Thanks for checking.

Larissa

On 10/21/10 7:53 AM, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> Please include reviewing time in the sprint estimations.  In several 
> cases, the reviews have been longer than the initial design and coding.
> 
> I am not sure how the new development model covers peer review, but it 
> was our goal for all development.
> _______________________________________________
> bind10-dev mailing list
> bind10-dev at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind10-dev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMwFTAAAoJEBOIp87tasiU5N8IAJNZD70SFwaMzI3/U8V5eYKK
MbKNLIW3Tw4adMDinvsoTNvFNXvWixpUvf0sP8X23C6RoQIbi5bZhhb9dSt45Vog
nPfUnTWT4le9iBunPd6R1zVA5yuUbZpqXMiujJtoLWUVGRiuuVgZRMJOqsG0/aiA
oqfijrFUFR+cka45vxqJOdWFOdHuolbQWFr4Vz+MklWQB3RBg8KMUyevvBL0nG7A
crVGCEr8hXpx2f5WDQo4nIA7RwQfdNWb+RkxEGDdIhkI1Bo7E9mLZyl/up5dB9B4
myjASnxNxteqav5OIo65oSiE9S1QLqibpko/SqdTuxBwduvaJwD/vdZaNskbfVU=
=3bh8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----