[bind10-dev] include "review" time in the sprint estimations

[Larissa Shapiro]

Shane,

Scrum very firmly insists that it assumes no specific development
practices (and people using it use and do not use various agile
development concepts, such as pair programming, tdd, etc)...

I 100% agree we should keep our review policy. I think it is an
excellent practice that has, as you say, served us very well. My hope is
that as we do a few sprints, the best way to estimate time for reviews
will become more clear.

Larissa

On 10/22/10 8:19 AM, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Larissa,
> 
>> Here is how I understand this issue. Peer review should be the same as
>> it has always been. One of the scrum concepts is the "definition of
>> done" and I know we still need to talk about this but I assume that peer
>> review is part of a feature being "done" for us.
> 
> Okay, that's cool. One worry of mine was that in the scrum world people
> assume "pair programming" and that they therefore don't have a review
> step. This review has been invaluable at ISC, so I think we need to keep
> it. :)
> 
> --
> Shane
>