[bind10-dev] Resolver response to NOTIFY query

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 jinmei at isc.org
Tue Apr 19 07:37:15 UTC 2011


Just happen to notice this.

At Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:43:54 +0100,
Stephen Morris <stephen at isc.org> wrote:

> > The variation seems to indicate it doesn't matter in practice:-)
> 
> So what is the consensus for BIND 10:  NOTIMP?

I don't think we had a clear consensus.  I personally don't care much
as I said, and I'm okay with NOTIMP.

> One other thing.  I've just noticed that the resolver does not return
> the qname in the response - the question section is empty.  This, I
> think, is an error - should not the qname be returned in all responses,
> regardless?

In my understanding the question section should be copied (either as a
de facto standard or specified in the spec) from the original query
except for some special error cases such as the format error.

---
JINMEI, Tatuya



More information about the bind10-dev mailing list