[bind10-dev] Resolver response to NOTIFY query
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
jinmei at isc.org
Tue Apr 19 07:37:15 UTC 2011
Just happen to notice this.
At Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:43:54 +0100,
Stephen Morris <stephen at isc.org> wrote:
> > The variation seems to indicate it doesn't matter in practice:-)
>
> So what is the consensus for BIND 10: NOTIMP?
I don't think we had a clear consensus. I personally don't care much
as I said, and I'm okay with NOTIMP.
> One other thing. I've just noticed that the resolver does not return
> the qname in the response - the question section is empty. This, I
> think, is an error - should not the qname be returned in all responses,
> regardless?
In my understanding the question section should be copied (either as a
de facto standard or specified in the spec) from the original query
except for some special error cases such as the format error.
---
JINMEI, Tatuya
More information about the bind10-dev
mailing list