[bind10-dev] Convention for address+port: forget rough consenus, lets vote!

[Anand Kumria]

I also option 4 is/was used when sending email to an address

i.e. shane@[149.20.64.42:53]

And it could thereforce be counted in as 'RFC-style' and consistent too.

A

On 10 August 2011 20:42, Shane Kerr <shane at isc.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> We had a thread last month about how to present address+ports in BIND
> 10:
>
> https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/2011-July/002459.html
>
> We don't think any consensus was reached. So, we're going to try an
> alternate strategy: voting.
>
> With the help of the some of the team, I created a doodle poll:
>
> http://www.doodle.com/rtbp6eb3xpmxre8q
>
> Please let us know what you think!
>
> Everyone is welcome to vote - this is just a poll to get an idea of what
> general opinion is.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Shane
>
> _______________________________________________
> bind10-dev mailing list
> bind10-dev at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind10-dev
>
>