[bind10-dev] should b10-auth return CNAME chain?

[Michal 'vorner' Vaner]

Hello

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:50:04PM -0800, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> We are now thinking about taking a different approach: don't return
> any chain after CNAME and always have the resolver follow it
> explicitly.  Do it at least the target zone isn't signed, and probably
> keep the same behavior even for signed zones.

In future, it might be worth optimising to put the whole chain there, but for
now I think we should be OK with the CNAME itself, not complicating our code
more before the Y2 release.

But I would rather stay with the not returning the chain forever, unless it
brings us any gain.

Have a nice day

-- 
Next sleep is scheduled after 1k lines of code

Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/attachments/20110122/69fe6ae6/attachment.bin>