[bind10-dev] flaws in reversed name-based approach for getting the "previous name"

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 jinmei at isc.org
Wed Oct 5 19:14:14 UTC 2011


At Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:22:40 +1100,
Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:

> > - In the call Joao mentioned that name label characters must be 7 bit
> >   (so there cannot be a domain name like "\255.example.com.")
> >   [...] But (if I
> >   understand Joao correctly) I didn't think we had such a restriction
> >   in label characters.  RFC2181 even seems to explicitly emphasize
> >   that we don't have such a restriction:

> At the DNS level there is no such restrictions.  LDH etc. are all upper
> level restrictions.

Okay, thanks for the confirmation.

---
JINMEI, Tatuya



More information about the bind10-dev mailing list