[bind10-dev] flaws in reversed name-based approach for getting the "previous name"
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
jinmei at isc.org
Wed Oct 5 19:14:14 UTC 2011
At Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:22:40 +1100,
Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
> > - In the call Joao mentioned that name label characters must be 7 bit
> > (so there cannot be a domain name like "\255.example.com.")
> > [...] But (if I
> > understand Joao correctly) I didn't think we had such a restriction
> > in label characters. RFC2181 even seems to explicitly emphasize
> > that we don't have such a restriction:
> At the DNS level there is no such restrictions. LDH etc. are all upper
> level restrictions.
Okay, thanks for the confirmation.
---
JINMEI, Tatuya
More information about the bind10-dev
mailing list