[bind10-dev] Persistence vs. shared memory
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Mon Sep 5 17:41:39 UTC 2011
* Michal Vaner:
> It seems we already decided to go with the shared memory model, so
> it might be off-topic, but I asked the friend I mentioned, about
> persistence, just out of curiosity. He sent me some lecture notes
> mentioning work of Sleator and Tarjan (but it doesn't contain exact
> reference, unfortunately). After reading through them, I can think
> of three ways of implementing the persistence for the DNS tree, so
> I'm sharing it just in case someone might be interested.
I'm not sure what this is about exactly, but there's also RCU
(a variant of persistence).
Are occasional pause times acceptable, or is there a stringent
real-time requirement?
More information about the bind10-dev
mailing list