[bind10-dev] Persistence vs. shared memory

[Tony Finch]

On 5 Sep 2011, at 19:07, Michal 'vorner' Vaner <michal.vaner at nic.cz> wrote:
> 
> In less strict sense, much everything described in the email could be considered
> RCU, but the difference is how it is done. Maybe I just used the word
> „persistence“ because I come from more theoretical background and we both think
> the same.

Your earlier message reminded me of the research I have read about into lock-free data structures and software transactional memory. For instance,
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/netos/lock-free/

Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/