[bind10-dev] MSQ-NG requirements

Steven Meyer smeyer at bluecatnetworks.com
Mon Apr 9 13:54:48 UTC 2012


The design of the msgq is not supportive of synchronous, point-to-point communications (i.e. RPC).  Sending large messages through such a centralized resource has negative impacts on many fronts. Therefore either the applications have to change to make use of the asynchronous, multi-point, queuing model or they should not be going thorough the msgq!  There is nothing to preclude using both a point-to-point model and a message queuing model for different types of messaging.

I see many assumptions implicit in the discussion so far, some of which may be wrong. Perhaps you should take a step back and elaborate on the application messaging requirements (the 'what') before you consider how to implement the solution? 

Regards,

Steven
________________________________
Steven Meyer, Ph.D, P.Eng
Director, Research
BlueCat Networks, Inc.
W: 416.646.8400 x751 | C: 647.403.5041| E-mail: smeyer at bluecatnetworks.com
4101 Yonge St.| ste. 502 | Toronto, Canada, M2P1N6.

IPAM, DNS & DHCP Go Virtual
Visit us at www.bluecatnetworks.com

This e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential information. If you believe that this e-mail has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message.  Any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information by someone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.


________________________________________
From: bind10-dev-bounces+smeyer=bluecatnetworks.com at lists.isc.org [bind10-dev-bounces+smeyer=bluecatnetworks.com at lists.isc.org] on behalf of bind10-dev-request at lists.isc.org [bind10-dev-request at lists.isc.org]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 8:00 AM
To: bind10-dev at lists.isc.org
Subject: bind10-dev Digest, Vol 36, Issue 7

Send bind10-dev mailing list submissions to
        bind10-dev at lists.isc.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind10-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        bind10-dev-request at lists.isc.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        bind10-dev-owner at lists.isc.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of bind10-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: MSGQ-NG requirements (Michal 'vorner' Vaner)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 13:37:05 +0200
From: Michal 'vorner' Vaner <michal.vaner at nic.cz>
To: bind10-dev at lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: [bind10-dev] MSGQ-NG requirements
Message-ID: <20120409113705.GA15328 at hydra>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello

I added few ideas how to get to the point when the features I think are needed
get implemented. The address is the same, please have a look:

On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:03:45AM +0200, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
> It is on the address:
> http://bind10.isc.org/wiki/msgqng (not linked from anywhere yet)

Thanks

With regards

--
This message is encrypted by double rot-13

Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/attachments/20120409/760cb84d/attachment-0001.bin>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
bind10-dev mailing list
bind10-dev at lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind10-dev


End of bind10-dev Digest, Vol 36, Issue 7
*****************************************


More information about the bind10-dev mailing list