[bind10-dev] minor problems on the existing BIND10 review procedure

Shane Kerr shane at isc.org
Wed Dec 12 10:38:58 UTC 2012


Jeremy,

On Tuesday, 2012-12-11 07:01:11 -0600, 
"Jeremy C. Reed" <jreed at isc.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Shane Kerr wrote:
> 
> > Basically I agree with Michal: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. :)
> > 
> > I am of course in favor of modifying the review procedure if we
> > expect specific benefits, but I am not convinced with any of the
> > proposals here.
> 
> These are not my new proposals.  I was just pointing out that that
> the review guidelines do not match reality.

Ah, okay! :)

> The point of my email was to fix the existing code review procedure.
> It is being considered for the best practices for use for other ISC 
> development and it has the mistakes noted in my email. Okay if I fix
> it?

More than okay - it is much appreciated if you do!

Thanks,

--
Shane


More information about the bind10-dev mailing list