[bind10-dev] b10-auth query performance: experiments and suggestions
Michal 'vorner' Vaner
michal.vaner at nic.cz
Thu Jan 19 04:51:14 UTC 2012
Hello
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 04:23:08PM -0800, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> We'll need something like these anyway, not for improving response
> performance but for reducing memory footprint. The current
> implementation stored everything in the form of higher-level objects,
> and very inefficient in terms of memory usage. This change would also
> be a necessary first step toward shared-memory type backend.
I fear that the shared memory backend would be more complicated than just this.
As the memory will be at a difference place in the address space, we won't be
able to use pointers. So it looks like we'll need to have some arrays with
different kinds of data and index them or have offset pointers or something like
that.
Anyway, I'd like to propose not to do these optimisations of the tree before we
design the new (shared memory) tree, unless we have a really good reason to do
them now.
With regards
--
XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, use more.
Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/attachments/20120119/f6f38858/attachment.bin>
More information about the bind10-dev
mailing list