[bind10-dev] cryptolink design

[Jelte Jansen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/17/2012 02:00 AM, Francis Dupont wrote:
> 
> => so the question is bind10 is bound to Botan for ever or we keep 
> a window open for PKCS#11? BTW bind9 is (was!) bound to OpenSSL
> and at the end it was clearly a bad idea.
> 

The idea behind the cryptolink in the first place was to not tie
ourselves too much to one implementation (or even type of backend,
especially with pkcs#11 in mind).

If other systems differentiate between these two types of calls, I
think we'll need to support that (even if they'd call the same
function for the current backend)

Jelte
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlAFYn8ACgkQ4nZCKsdOncUUMwCeIVg/Kxn7udbhbnqgHRtCYo+q
nHoAnjxlH8wAzIzKiqlEvdkQNuZuaLfh
=0dC6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----