[bind10-dev] resolver performance research, take 2
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
jinmei at isc.org
Tue Jul 17 18:19:56 UTC 2012
At Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:09:51 -0700,
Jerry Scharf <scharf at isc.org> wrote:
>
> My guess is that the vast majority of these are queries with predictable
> structure for things where the error is returned by a registry
> controlled authoritative server. Would it make sense to allow the user
> to configure a longer cache time for this case to reduce the upstream
> queries? Would a 12 hour cache on these make a significant difference in
> upstream queries? I bet just doing this for the root, where the real
> world update rate is measured in months/years between additions of new
> TLDs, would help quite a bit.
Its real effectiveness aside, one possible way for the root zone would
be to act as an unofficial secondary of root. At least the F root
server allows zone transfer, so anyone can be a secondary without
breaking the integrity of the name space. (How to integrate it in the
resolver is a question, but here I'm just talking about possibilities
feature-wise).
---
JINMEI, Tatuya
More information about the bind10-dev
mailing list