[bind10-dev] new in-memory zone data design

[Michal 'vorner' Vaner]

Good morning

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:39:20PM +0200, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Optimizing this way will probably only save a few percentage of memory
> footprint though, so perhaps not worth the effort?

I think we want to achieve a reasonable memory footprint, not the lowest
possible at all costs ;-). Or is it because we want more data to fit into
caches and be slightly faster? I don't think it will work unless we lay out the
data in memory manually in some way.

Also, speaking about layout and the structures with variable length, are we
aware that it's not possible to place any data at any address, right?

With regards

-- 
Fragile. Do not turn umop ap1sdn!

Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/attachments/20120622/099cdf4a/attachment.bin>