[bind10-dev] maybe missing changelog entries?

Michal 'vorner' Vaner michal.vaner at nic.cz
Thu Mar 1 13:16:38 UTC 2012


Hello

On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:53:09AM -0600, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> A normal git log says "merged" and doesn't tell me what. (Can anyone 
> share an quick and easy way to use git to better get logging?)

Well, I usually do write the message as „merged #number“, so it's better to
recognize. Anyway, you could still use the fact we put the [number] at the
beginning of the commit messages, so you could iterate through the parents of
the merge commit (if merge commit is 123456abcd, then 123456abcd~1 is the
leftmost parent, the next one is ~2, etc ‒ not to be confused with ^, which
momes vertically in history, eg going to older ones). One of them would have a
[number] that is not a [master].

Would that help?

With regards

-- 
When eating an elephant take one bite at a time.
		-- Gen. C. Abrams

Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/attachments/20120301/bbbad5d5/attachment.bin>


More information about the bind10-dev mailing list