[bind10-dev] recent performance improvements

[JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉]

At Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:05:35 -0500 (CDT),
"Jeremy C. Reed" <jreed at isc.org> wrote:
> 
> Mine were:

I don't understand this:

> bind-9.9.0 root-memory-.success 50519.012123 qps

Does this mean you ran bind-9.9.0 (built with threads) without
specifying -n?  Or does this mean you specified "-n 1"?  If it's the
latter I suspect there's an error in the test.  If it's the former,
the comparison is misleading because it uses multiple threads.

When we want to compare bind9 with a single-process bind 10, we need
to specify '-n 1' for bind9 (or more preferably, build bind9 without
threads because it would still use other threads running on other
cores for network I/O and timer events).

---
JINMEI, Tatuya